To write a compare and contrast essay at university, choose meaningfully connected topics, examine them using shared criteria and defend a clear argument. Your main task is analysis: explain what the analysis reveals, rather than catalogue similarities and contrasts.
University assignments reward judgement, so describing each subject separately won’t usually answer the question. Start by identifying a relationship worth investigating, then build your structure around the evidence.
Key Takeaways
- Choose two related topics, then select criteria that answer the assignment question.
- Write a thesis that names the subjects and explains what readers should learn through the analysis.
- Use the block method for shorter comparisons and point-by-point organisation for longer arguments. In either structure, explain how the evidence supports your judgement.
Choose Subjects and Plan the Comparison
A focused analysis uncovers subtle contrasts or unexpected similarities. Stating that two novels feature female protagonists gives you a starting observation, but it doesn’t yet establish an argument.
Find a Meaningful Connection
Choose two topics that address a shared question. Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice and Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre, for example, both connect women’s independence with marriage and financial security.
Other workable pairings include two explanations of the same historical event or two studies investigating the same outcome. However, matching topics alone isn’t enough: decide what comparing them could help you understand.
Keep the scope manageable. Examining two novels’ treatment of marriage is more focused than analysing everything about them.
Map Similarities and Differences
Draw overlapping circles for a Venn diagram. Put shared features in the overlap and contrasts outside it. Then organize your strongest observations into a criteria chart.
For the two novels, your initial chart might look like this:
| Criterion | Pride and Prejudice | Jane Eyre |
|---|---|---|
| Refusing marriage | Elizabeth rejects Mr Collins | Jane rejects marriage to St John |
| Narrative perspective | Third-person narration | Jane’s first-person account |
| Financial security | Marriage brings Elizabeth wealth | Jane inherits before marrying Rochester |
The useful rows connect textual details to women’s choices. Add quotations, chapter references and provisional interpretations beneath each entry before drafting.

Write a Thesis and Introduction That Answer the Question
Your thesis statement should name both works and explain the insight your analysis supports. Avoid promising only that they have similarities and contrasts.
Turn Observations Into a Defensible Claim
Move beyond “Both novels explore marriage” towards an interpretation:
“Although Pride and Prejudice and Jane Eyre both defend women’s freedom to refuse marriage, Austen connects Elizabeth’s eventual security with marriage, whereas Brontë gives Jane financial independence before she marries.”
This claim identifies the works, establishes common ground and explains a meaningful difference. It also gives your body paragraphs something to demonstrate.
Draft it provisionally after planning your evidence. If the completed analysis supports a narrower claim, revise the thesis rather than stretching your interpretation.
Open With Context, Then State Your Argument
Your introduction needs an engaging opening, both texts, relevant background and a clear thesis. A focused intellectual problem usually works better than a sweeping claim about human history.
For example: “Refusing a proposal allows Elizabeth Bennet and Jane Eyre to defend their judgement. However, the novels give their heroines different routes to financial security.”
Next, identify the authors and texts before stating your thesis. Briefly indicate your main criteria if readers need a roadmap.
Our guide to writing a university essay introduction develops this connection between the opening promise and the argument that follows.
Choose Between the Block and Point-by-Point Methods
Both structures can produce strong essays. Choose an organization that suits your argument’s complexity and your assignment’s requirements.

Use the Block Method for Shorter Comparisons
The block method, or subject-by-subject organisation, covers all selected points about Subject A before moving to Subject B.
For the novels, examine Elizabeth’s refusals, narrative presentation and finances first. Then discuss Jane using the same criteria in the same order.
This approach suits shorter essays because readers can remember details about the first subject while reading about the second. However, the second block must refer explicitly to the first. Otherwise, you risk presenting two summaries instead of a connected argument.
Keep your criteria consistent. Discussing narration for Austen but only plot for Brontë would weaken your argument.
Use Point-by-Point Organisation for Longer Arguments
Point-by-point organisation examines both subjects under each criterion before moving to the next. It’s usually most effective for longer essays comparing articles, short stories or novels.
For long works, plan at least three substantial points unless your brief requires a narrower approach. Each point will usually need more than one body paragraph for evidence and interpretation.
For point-by-point work, organize the essay around one criterion at a time. The UNC guide to comparing and contrasting explains these organizational choices.
A five-paragraph outline is one common starting structure: an introduction, three comparative body paragraphs and a conclusion. Longer university assignments need more room, so don’t treat five paragraphs as a compulsory limit.
Turn Each Chart Row Into an Analytical Paragraph
Each paragraph needs a claim, relevant evidence and an explanation of what that evidence establishes. The UNC guide to paragraph development provides further guidance on developing a central point.
Build the Claim Before Adding Evidence
Take the chart’s “refusing marriage” row. Your topic sentence should interpret the refusals, rather than announce that both characters receive proposals.
Next, select evidence from each text. Explain the first example, introduce the second and analyse the relationship between them. Finally, connect that relationship to your thesis.
The familiar Point, Evidence, Explanation structure helps, provided you leave room for qualification. Our advice on building evidence-based student arguments develops this approach.
Place citations close to borrowed material. For literary analysis, use page references from your edition or another locator permitted by your referencing style.
Model Comparative Body Paragraph
Both Elizabeth Bennet and Jane Eyre refuse proposals that would require them to subordinate personal judgement to another person’s expectations. Elizabeth rejects Mr Collins despite the financial security the marriage could offer her family, resisting her mother’s pressure to accept him (Austen, chapter 19). Similarly, Jane refuses St John’s proposal because his proposed missionary partnership excludes the love she considers necessary for marriage (Brontë, chapters 34 and 35). However, the pressures differ: Elizabeth faces a family-centred argument about economic prudence, whereas St John frames compliance as religious duty. Together, these refusals show that both novels defend a woman’s authority over her marital choice, whilst locating the threat to that authority in different social demands.
Use Transitions That Express the Relationship
Transitions tell readers how your evidence connects. Choose them according to the reasoning, rather than adding them merely to vary sentence openings.
For similarities, useful expressions include “similarly”, “likewise”, “in the same way”, “just as” and “both”. For differences, use “however”, “unlike”, “on the other hand”, “in contrast”, “whereas” and “conversely”.
“Whereas” works well in a direct contrast: “Elizabeth gains financial security through marriage, whereas Jane inherits before marrying Rochester.”
However, a transition cannot replace analysis. After identifying that difference, explain why its timing matters to your interpretation of independence. Also, use “conversely” only when the second point reverses the first relationship, rather than introducing any difference.
Revise the Argument and Write the Ending
Revision should test your reasoning before you polish individual sentences. Read your thesis followed by each paragraph’s opening sentence.
Test Whether Every Paragraph Advances the Comparison
Together, those sentences should form an argument. If a paragraph merely recounts a plot or summarises one source, explain its comparative purpose or remove it.
The UNC guidance on reorganising drafts can help you reconsider paragraph order.
When comparing studies, examine populations, methods and outcome measures before describing findings as contradictory. A small interview study may reveal detailed experiences without establishing how common they are. Similarly, evidence of association doesn’t establish causation.
Keep quotations proportionate. One carefully interpreted passage can support your argument better than several unexplained extracts.
End With the Insight Your Evidence Supports
Your conclusion should answer the assignment question and restate the thesis in fresh language. Synthesize the relationship you have demonstrated instead of repeating every paragraph’s claim.
For the novel comparison, draw together what the heroines’ choices and financial circumstances reveal about independence. Keep that broader insight within the boundaries established by your analysis.
Don’t introduce another text, statistic or argument at this stage. Our guide to writing a focused essay conclusion explains how to match your final judgement to the evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions About Compare-and-Contrast Essays
Can I Compare More Than Two Subjects?
Yes, if the assignment permits it and you have enough space for meaningful analysis. Use shared criteria across every subject so the analysis remains coherent. However, each added item increases the evidence you need. Two carefully selected texts often allow more depth than several loosely connected ones.
Do Both Subjects Need Equal Space?
They need fair treatment, but not identical word counts. Allocate space according to your argument and the complexity of the evidence. If one subject receives much less attention, consider whether readers have enough information to understand the comparison. Avoid allowing your more familiar subject to dominate simply because it’s easier to discuss.
Make Every Comparison Support Your Answer
A strong compare-and-contrast essay uses shared criteria to reach a defensible judgement. Its structure should make the relationship between subjects easy to follow, whilst its paragraphs explain why that relationship matters.
Before submitting, read your thesis and topic sentences together. They should present a clear answer that your evidence can support.

